@푸카개독력이 그 지식을 마비시킴.

그리고 나보고 애송이라 할 클라스는 아니지ㅋㅋㅋ

@글벗무슨 악영향이여?

@글벗왜 바이러스죠? 동성애가 전염이라도 되나요? 그리고 동성애자들이 동성 결혼을 하면 이성애자 부부들이 애기를 덜 낳기라도 합니까? 전혀 개연성이 없는 근거를 가지고 오시네요.

오히려 동성 부부의 경우 입양을 적극적으로 함으로써 사회에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는데요?

@글벗그 통계 어디서 보셨습니까? 교회에서요?ㅋㅋ

http://m.blog.naver.com/a_lord/10159000453
만약 동성애가 후천적이며 문화의 영향이라면 당연히 전염도 되어야 한다.

하지만 이미 동성애가 자유로운 서유럽 국가들에서 동성애자의 수는 전혀 증가하지

않으며(물론 인구 증가대비 증가와 숨어있던 인구의 커밍아웃은 제회하고)일정하게

유지되고 있다.

또한 이때는 서 유럽의 동성애 숫자가 기하급수적으로 증가해야 하는데, 안 그렇거든

@글벗그게 뭐가 문제냐고요. 원래 자기 정체성 찾아가는 게 뭐가 나쁩니까? 국가를 위해서 억지로 원하지도 않는 애 낳아야 해요? 전체주의자세요?


그리고 통계요? http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/workinpsychiatry/specialinterestgroups/gaylesbian/submissiontothecofe.aspx?theme=mobile

http://www.apa.org/about/policy/sexual-orientation.aspx


어디서 보신 건지 모르겠네요. 네이버에 검색해보니끼 미의학회에서 그렇다~고는 하는데 출처가 안나와있는데요?

@글벗링크는 네이버 블로그이기에 안들어가봤다라... 그러면 저기서 사용된 레퍼런스들만 가져와 보겠습니다. 이건 블로그 아니니까 다 읽어보시던가요.
http://cms.bsu.edu/-/media/WWW/DepartmentalContent/CounselingCenter/PDFs/SAFEZONE%20Resources/Children%20of%20gays%20and%20Lesbians.pdf
American Psychological Association (2004). Resolution on sexual
orientation, parents, and children. Retrieved September 25,
2006, from http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbc/policy/parentschildren.
pdf
Brewaeys, A., Ponjaert, I., Van Hall, E.V., & Golombok, S. (1997).
Donor insemination: Child development and family functioning in
lesbian mother families. Human Reproduction, 12, 1349–1359.
Chan, R.W., Raboy, B., & Patterson, C.J. (1998). Psychosocial adjustment
among children conceived via donor insemination by lesbian
and heterosexual mothers. Child Development, 69, 443–457.

@글벗논쟁을 싫어하면 헛소리를 하지 마시던가요. 헛소리를 해서 지적 좀 했더니 저는 언쟁이 시러여~하면서 도망가는 꼴이란ㅋㅋㅋ님 덕분에 동성애 반대론자들이 멍청하고 비겁하다는 사실만 더 알아갑니다 ^ㅗ^